BACKGROUND
Most species on earth, including cyanobacteria, plants, insects, and mammals synchronize their behavioral and vital physiological activities with the daily environmental cycles of light and dark and of high and low temperature. They achieve such synchronization by a molecular circadian clock that is active in each cell of most tissues and is synchronized with environmental cycles. Importantly the circadian clock maintains its oscillation under constant conditions, such as in constant darkness, confirming that oscillations of behavioral and physiological activities are indeed driven by a self-sustained, auto-regulatory molecular clock and are not simply a direct response to environmental changes. A difference between the time of our molecular clock and the environmental daytime is experienced as a yet lag.
The circadian clock regulates a wide variety of physiological activities including the sleep/wake cycle, liver function, heart rate, body temperature, blood pressure, neuronal activities, and others. Ultimately circadian oscillation of behavioral and physiological activities are driven by a clock controlled oscillation of genome-wide transcription of genes with key-regulatory functions in metabolism, signal transduction, immunity, neuronal activity and other processes.
In mammals and Drosophila the circadian clock is constituted by a set of transcription factors that are highly homologous and function analogously. The excellent genetic and biochemical accessibility of Drosophila has therefore been instrumental in identifying genes and mechanisms that constitute the circadian clock in insects and mammals. In both species the basic-helix-loop-helix proteins CLOCK (CLK) and CYCLE (CYC) form a heterodimeric complex that activates transcription of genes with E-box elements in their promotor region. Two CLK/CYC-activated genes, period (per) and timeless (tim), form heterodimeric complexes themselves that accumulate during night and negatively feedback on their own transcription by inhibition of CLK/CYC. Light-induced degradation of TIM results in a decomposition of the PER/TIM inhibitor during daytime allowing a restart of CLK/CYC-activated transcription towards the end of the day. CLK/CYC also activates transcription of vrille (vri) that negatively regulates transcription of Clk resulting in an oscillation of CLK expression. These transcriptional feedback loops constitute the basic mechanism of the circadian clock allowing oscillations in clock-protein concentrations and cyclic regulation of clock output pathways.
OUR RESEARCH GOALS
The goal of our research is the investigation of the genes and mechanisms that constitute the circadian clock and allow a synchronization of vital activities not only with the environmental cycles but importantly also with one another. We facilitate genetic screens in Drosophila as well as inhibitor screens in cell culture to identify novel clock-associated genes. We successfully isolated mutations in novel clock-associated genes, which we further characterize by genetic and molecular biological methods. Results of these studies elucidate two major aspects of circadian regulation that are poorly understood to date. One focus is the interaction between circadian and cell signaling that on one hand allows circadian regulation of a wide variety of cellular processes, on the other hand allows an entrainment of the circadian clock by non-photic metabolic or behavioral activity. A second focus is the question of how temperature affects the circadian clock allowing circadian and seasonal rhythms to be driven by light and temperature cycles. The novel mutations that we isolated previously provide unique tools to gain insights into these mechanisms.
A third focus of our research is the effect of the circadian clock on the cell cycle, potentially providing means for a circadianly adjusted treatment of cancer that maximizes chemotherapy of tumor cells, while minimizing unwanted side effects.
Download BZH Report Weber 2008-2010
2011
A. Lamaze, A. Lamouroux, C. Vias, H-C. Hung, F. Weber and F. Rouyer, The E3 ubiquitin ligase CTRIP controls CLOCK levels and PERIOD oscillations in Drosophila.
EMBO Rep. 2011 (12), 549-557.
F. Weber, D. Zorn, C. Rademacher and H-C. Hung, Post-translational timing mechanisms of the Drosophila circadian clock.
FEBS Lett. 2011 (585), 1443-1449.
2009
H-C. Hung, C. Maurer, D. Zorn, W-L. Chang and F. Weber, Sequential and compartment-specific phosphorylation controls the life cycle of the circadian CLOCK protein.
J Biol Chem. 2009 (284), 23734-23742.
C. Maurer, H-C. Hung and F. Weber, Cytoplasmic interaction with CYCLE promotes the post-translational processing of the circadian CLOCK protein.
FEBS Lett. 2009 (583), 1561-1566.
H-C. Hung, S. Kay and F. Weber, HSP90, a capacitor of behavioural variation.
J. Biol. Rhythms. 2009 (24), 183-192.
F. Weber, Remodelling the clock: Co-activators and signal transduction in the circadian clock works.
Naturwissenschaften 2009 (96), 321-337. (Review)
2008
R. Brunsing, S.A. Omori, F. Weber, A. Bicknell, L. Friend, R. Rickert, M. Niwa, B- and T-cell development both involve activity of the unfolded protein response pathway.
J Biol Chem. 2008 (283), 17954-17961.
2007
Hung HC, Maurer C, Kay SA, Weber F. Circadian transcription depends on limiting amounts of the transcription co-activator nejire/CBP.
J Biol Chem. 2007 (282), 31349-31357.
Hung HC, Maurer C, Weber F. A role for the CREB-binding protein in behavioural regulation.
BMC Neuroscience 2007, Suppl. 1: P28.
2006
Weber F, Hung HC, Maurer C, Kay SA. Second messenger and Ras/MAPK signalling pathways regulate CLOCK/CYCLE-dependent transcription.
J Neurochem. 2006 (98), 248-257.
2003
F. Weber and S.A. Kay, A PERIOD-inhibitor buffer introduces a delay mechanism for CLK/CYC-activated transcription.
FEBS Lett. 2003 (555), 341-345.
2002
A.E. Ashcroft, A. Brinker, J.E. Coyle, F. Weber, M. Kaiser, L. Moroder, M.R. Parsons,J. Jager, U.F. Hartl, M. Hayer-Hartl, S.E. Radford, Structural plasticity and non-covalent substrate binding in the GroEL apical domain: A study using electrospray ionisation mass spectrometry and fluorescence binding studies.
J Biol Chem. 2002 (277), 33115-33126.
2000
F. Weber and M.K. Hayer-Hartl, Refolding of bovine mitochondrial rhodanese by chaperonins GroEL and GroES.
Meth. in Mol. Biol. 2000 (140), 117-126.
F. Weber and M.K. Hayer-Hartl, Prevention of rhodanese aggregation by the chaperonin GroEL. Meth. in Mol. Biol. 2000 (140), 111-116.
F. Weber, Removing trace fluorescent contaminants from preparations of GroEL.
Meth. in Mol. Biol. 2000 (140), 63-64.
1998
F. Weber, F. Keppel, C. Georgopoulos, M.K. Hayer-Hartl and F.U. Hartl, The oligomeric structure of GroEL-GroES is required for biological significant chaperonin function in protein folding.
Nature Struct. Biol. 1998 (11), 977-985.
1996
M.K. Hayer-Hartl, F. Weber and F.U. Hartl, Mechanism of chaperonin action: GroES binding and release can drive GroEL-mediated protein folding in the absence of ATP.
EMBO J. 1996 (15), 6111-6121.
1994
L.F. Julie, E. Schatz, M.D. Ward, F. Weber and L.J. Yellowlees,
J. Chem. Soc. Dalton trans. 1994 (6), 799.